Information Technology (IT),
Information-
and Communication Technology (ICT)
"Information Technology (IT) or Information and
Communication(s) Technology (ICT) is the technology required
for information processing. In particular the use of electronic
computers and computer software to convert, store, protect,
process, transmit, and retrieve information. " (Wikipedia,
2005).
The term information technology has been used in at least
since
Connolly (1944). The term Information and communication
technology is more recent and the addition of communication
is probably due to the raise of computer networks based on
telecommunications (such as remote access to databases and the
Internet).
Lamb's
attribution of the concept [IT] appears accurate: in
Cybernetics (1948) and The Human Use of Human Beings
(1950), Wiener had written about the coming of a "second
industrial revolution" based on the processing of information in
computerized, automated factories. Lamb was wrong about the
coinage, however. The term information technology arose
in management science in the United States in the 1960s, where
it signified computer-based mathematical techniques designed to
replace mid-level managers. By the early 1980s,
several discourse communities—policy analysts, business writers,
managers, information scientists, and social scientists—had
transformed this knowledge-based meaning into the artifactual
meaning described by Lamb. (Kline, 2006, 513-514).
The study of IT and ICT is mainly based in
theoretical computer
science and -technology. There exists, however, a huge range
of disciplines and interdisciplinary fields, including social
sciences and humanities, which contribute to IT/ICT (or claim to
do so). (See also Gorn, 1967, 1982). Information technology (IT)
has recently emerged as a separate academic discipline. The IT
discipline is related to, but distinct from, computer science,
information systems, and software engineering (cf., Abernethy et
al., 2005; Lunt et al., 2003).
Relations between Library and Information Science
(LIS) and IT/ICT.
From the perspective of IT and computer science are libraries
one field of application among others (such as administration,
agriculture, banks, e-business, education or entertainment).
There exists special journals for this field of applied IT such
as Journal of Library Automation
(change of title in 1982 to Information Technology and
Libraries). Some people may even mix up LIS with computer
science applied to libraries and to "information storage and
retrieval"
The publication Annual
Review of Information Science and Technology has from its
start in 1966 had IT in its title. That American Society for
Information Science in year 2000 changed its name to
American Society for Information Science and Technology
(ASIS&T) is another sign that IT is by some considered at least a
part of the field of LIS.
On a more specific level one may consider Internet research.
When is research about the Internet a part of LIS and when is it a part of
other fields? (See
Disciplinarity/interdisciplinarity: The example of Internet
research). The answer is probably that research fields do
not "belong" to disciplines, but that disciplines contribute to
research fields in various degrees and may only claim
territories to which they can document main contributions. In the field of Internet-research only certain narrow fields such
as
Webometrics may be considered
parts of LIS.
Other people, among them people associated with cultural
studies, have different conceptions of LIS. They tend to regard the influence of
IT as a narrow and reductionist view of LIS. The application of IT-solutions
within LIS may partly be characterized as "a technological fix": the idea that
complicated problems related to knowledge, meaning and values may be solved by
more or less simple technical solutions. Saracevic (1992, p. 6) thus describes
the influence from Vannevar Bush on the development of
information science after 1945 as such a technological fix. Bush proposed a
solution to the information explosion
that was much in accordance with the
zeitgeist and also a
strategically attractive solution. (For a broader criticism of "technological
fixes" is refereed to Hoffmeyer,
1985, in Danish).
One of the drawbacks of the influence of the way of
thinking associated with technical fix have been a blocking of a deeper
understanding of the problems and their connections. The consequence may be that
the field becomes intellectually discontinuous and that ways of thinking in cheap
dodges takes over on all levels.
The ridiculous by confusing LIS with IT is best understood in a historical
perspective. Older textbooks in LIS may, for example describe the technique of
photocopiers. Today it is clear for us that this not relevant and a confusion of
categories. (Perhaps we may still not see this. One of my favorite examples is
Fax for libraries (Dewey, 1990)). However, as long as a technology is new
there is a strong tendency to do research about it in LIS. Such research has
very little influence on the development or application of the technology (cf., Saracevic & Dalbello, 2003 on digital libraries). A
consequence is that the field has neglected to develop relevant knowledge and
when looking back has too little to offer. (One critical analysis of LIS-professionals'
relation to IT is Olsson, 1992).
Literature:
Abernethy, K.; Gabbert, P.; Treu, K.; Piegari, G. &
Reichgelt, H. (2005). Impact of the emerging discipline of information
technology on computing curricula: some experiences. Journal
of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 21(2), 237 - 243.
Buschmann, J. (1993). Information technology, power
structures, and the fate of librarianship. Progressive librarian,
Issue number 6/7.
http://www.libr.org/PL/6-7_Buschman.html
Connolly, J. M. (1944). The
U. S. Air Force Information Officer Overseas: A Need for Special Applications of
Information Technology. (Master's thesis) Boston University, Mass. 2s.
NTIS Accession Number: AD-605 446/XAB
Dewey, P. R. (1990). Fax for libraries. Westport:
Meckler.
Gorn, S. (1967). The computer and information sciences and the community of disciplines. Behavioral Science, 12(6), 433-
Gorn, S. (1982). Informatics (Computer
and Information Science) –Its ideology, methodology, and sociology.
Knowledge-Creation Diffusion Utilization, 4(2), 173-198.
Hjørland, B.
(2000). Documents, Memory Institutions, and
Information Science. Journal of Documentation, vol. 56(1), s.
27-41.
Kline, R. R. (2006), Cybernetics, management science,
and technology policy: The emergence of "information technology" as a
keyword, 1948-1985. Technology and Culture, 47(3), 513-535.
Lunt, B; Reichgelt, H.; Ashford,
T.; Phelps, A.; Slazinsk, E & Willis, C. (2003).What is the new discipline of
information technology? Where does it fit?
CIEC Conference January 28 thru
31, 2003, Tucson, Arizona.
Session ETD
343.
http://fie.engrng.pitt.edu/ciec2003/papers/9066.pdf
(Visited 18 April 2004).
Hoffmeyer, J. (1985). Samfundets naturhistorie. 2. udgave.
Charlottenlund: Rosinante. (1. udg. 1982).
Olsson, L. (1992). I&D och profession - en fråga om teknik? Bidrag til 8:de Nordiska
IoD, Helsingborg 19-21 maj, 1992. 10 sider. (I proceedings kun resumé på 1 side
- manuskript udleveret på konferencen)
Orlikowski, W. J. & Iacono, C. S. (2001). Research
commentary: Desperately seeking the "IT" in IT research - A call to theorizing
the IT artifact. Information Systems Research, 12(2), 121-134.
Saracevic, T. (1992). Information science: origin, evolution and relations.
IN: Conceptions of Library and Information Science. Historical, empirical and
theoretical perspectives. Ed. by Pertti Vakkari & Blaise Cronin. London: Taylor
Graham. (Pp. 5-27).
Saracevic, T. and Dalbello, M. (2003). Digital library
research and digital library practice: How do they inform each other? An
unpublished study.
http://www.scils.rutgers.edu/~tefko/Saracevic_Dalbello_DLib_02.doc
Warner, J. (2000). What should we understand by information
technology (and some hints at other issues)? Aslib Proceedings, 52(9),
350-370.
Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.(2005). Information
Technology.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_technology
Journal:
Journal of Information Technology. London: Chapman & Hall, vol. 1-,
1986-. (Journal of the Association for Information Technology).
http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jit/
See also: Automation;
Computer science, theoretical;
Information
Technology; Library technique
Birger Hjørland
Last edited:
21-11-2006
Home
to be edited:
I forhold til BDI-sektoren udgør edb især et medium for de dokumenter, der er BDI-områdets raison d'etre. Medie-aspektet udgør kun et blandt mange væsentlige
aspekter ved dokumenterne. Af disse er medie-aspektet - i al fald indtil videre
- det mest udvendige aspekt ved et dokument. Dette giver sig f.eks. udtryk i, at
det samme dokument, f.eks. den samme avis, ofte er tilgængelige i mange medier:
trykt udgave, mikrofilm, online og som cd-rom. Dokumentets faglige indhold er
temmelig upåagtet af, hvad medium, det optræder i. Der er således ikke nogen
nær eller direkte sammenhæng mellem den faglige udviklingslinie, der påvirker
dokumenternes indhold og den teknologiske udviklingslinie, der påvirker
dokumenternes medier: medieudviklingen foregår efter en teknologisk
udviklingslinie, der hovedsageligt formes i de meget store teknologiske
forskningslaboratorier, f.eks. Philips. Denne udvikling kan BDI-forskningen
næppe gøre sig forhåbninger om at bidrage væsentligt til.
Der kan være tale om en forskning (lad os kalde det følgeforskning), der når den
nye teknologi er introduceret undersøger dens anvendelse i BDI-sektoren. Der kan
f.eks. være tale om pædagogiske, psykologiske, sociologiske, økonomiske og
organisatoriske analyser af informationsteknologens konsekvenser (se
*informationsteknologi, konsekvensvurdering for BDI-sektoren), eller f.eks.
udformning af hjælpesystemer, brugerundervisning o.lign. konstruktive bidrag.
Alt i alt er denne "følgeforskning" dog temmelig passiv og uden større mulighed
for konstruktive at præge BDI-sektorens egen fremtid.
En aktiv, indflydelsesrig forskningsindsats forudsætter et andet perspektiv. Den
forudsætter, at man ikke tager udgangspunkt i informationsteknologien, men
anvender denne som et middel til at løse de opgaver, der dybest set er
BDI-sektorens, f.eks. informationssøgningens problematik.
Man kan således gå ned i dagens virkelighed, og se på hvordan forskere (eller
andre brugere) søger information, hvor effektivt det foregår, og sætte sig som
målsætning at bidrage til en effektivisering af denne informationssøgning (som
f.eks. Hjørland, 1989). Man kan herpå identificere nogle problemer og prøve at
anføre deres løsning, herunder måske opstille krav til
informationsteknologiske systemer. Sådanne forskningsproblemer er på mange
måder meget krævende, men det er på dette plan de virkeligt relevante problemer
for BDI-forskningen ligger.