Information Technology (IT),

Information- and Communication Technology (ICT)

"Information Technology (IT) or Information and Communication(s) Technology (ICT) is the technology required for information processing. In particular the use of electronic computers and computer software to convert, store, protect, process, transmit, and retrieve information. " (Wikipedia, 2005).

 

The term information technology has been used in at least since Connolly (1944). The term Information and communication technology is more recent and the addition of communication is probably due to the raise of computer networks based on telecommunications (such as remote access to databases and the Internet).

 

Lamb's attribution of the concept [IT] appears accurate: in Cybernetics (1948) and The Human Use of Human Beings (1950), Wiener had written about the coming of a "second industrial revolution" based on the processing of information in computerized, automated factories. Lamb was wrong about the coinage, however. The term information technology arose in management science in the United States in the 1960s, where it signified computer-based mathematical techniques designed to replace mid-level managers. By the early 1980s, several discourse communities—policy analysts, business writers, managers, information scientists, and social scientists—had transformed this knowledge-based meaning into the artifactual meaning described by Lamb. (Kline, 2006, 513-514).

 

The study of IT and ICT is mainly based in theoretical computer science and -technology. There exists, however, a huge range of disciplines and interdisciplinary fields, including social sciences and humanities, which contribute to IT/ICT (or claim to do so). (See also Gorn, 1967, 1982). Information technology (IT) has recently emerged as a separate academic discipline. The IT discipline is related to, but distinct from, computer science, information systems, and software engineering (cf., Abernethy et al., 2005; Lunt et al., 2003).

 

 

Relations between Library and Information Science (LIS) and IT/ICT.

From the perspective of IT and computer science are libraries one field of application among others (such as administration, agriculture, banks, e-business, education or entertainment). There exists special journals for this field of applied IT such as Journal of Library Automation (change of title in 1982 to Information Technology and Libraries). Some people may even mix up LIS with computer science applied to libraries and to "information storage and retrieval"

 

The publication Annual Review of Information Science and Technology has from its start in 1966 had IT in its title. That American Society for Information Science in year 2000 changed its name to American Society for Information Science and Technology (ASIS&T) is another sign that IT is by some considered at least a part of the field of LIS.

 

On a more specific level one may consider Internet research. When is research about the Internet a part of LIS and when is it a part of other fields? (See Disciplinarity/interdisciplinarity: The example of Internet research). The answer is probably that research fields do not "belong" to disciplines, but that disciplines contribute to research fields in various degrees and may only claim territories to which they can document main contributions. In the field of Internet-research only certain narrow fields such as

Webometrics may be considered parts of LIS.

 

Other people, among them people associated with cultural studies, have different conceptions of LIS. They tend to regard the influence of IT as a narrow and reductionist view of LIS. The application of IT-solutions within LIS may partly be characterized as "a technological fix": the idea that complicated problems related to knowledge, meaning and values may be solved by more or less simple technical solutions. Saracevic (1992, p. 6) thus describes the influence from Vannevar Bush on the development of information science after 1945 as such a technological fix. Bush proposed a solution to the information explosion that was much in accordance with the zeitgeist and also a strategically attractive solution. (For a broader criticism of "technological fixes" is refereed to Hoffmeyer, 1985, in Danish).

 

One of the drawbacks of the influence of the way of thinking associated with technical fix have been a blocking of a deeper understanding of the problems and their connections. The consequence may be that the field becomes intellectually discontinuous and that ways of thinking in cheap dodges  takes over on all levels.

The ridiculous by confusing LIS with IT is best understood in a historical perspective. Older textbooks in LIS may, for example describe the technique of photocopiers. Today it is clear for us that this not relevant and a confusion of categories. (Perhaps we may still not see this. One of my favorite examples is Fax for libraries (Dewey, 1990)). However, as long as a technology is new there is a strong tendency to do research about it in LIS. Such research has very little influence on the development or application of the technology (cf., Saracevic & Dalbello, 2003 on digital libraries). A consequence is that the field has neglected to develop relevant knowledge and when looking back has too little to offer. (One critical analysis of LIS-professionals' relation to IT is Olsson, 1992).


 

 

 


 

Literature:

 

Abernethy, K.; Gabbert, P.; Treu, K.; Piegari, G. & Reichgelt, H. (2005). Impact of the emerging discipline of information technology on computing curricula: some experiences. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 21(2), 237 - 243.  

 

Buschmann, J. (1993). Information technology, power structures, and the fate of librarianship. Progressive librarian, Issue number 6/7. http://www.libr.org/PL/6-7_Buschman.html

 

Connolly, J. M. (1944). The  U. S. Air Force Information Officer Overseas: A Need for Special Applications of Information Technology. (Master's thesis)  Boston University, Mass. 2s. NTIS Accession Number: AD-605 446/XAB

 

Dewey, P. R. (1990). Fax for libraries. Westport: Meckler.
 
Gorn, S. (1967). The computer and information sciences and the community of disciplines. Behavioral Science, 12(6),  433-

 

Gorn, S. (1982). Informatics (Computer and Information Science) –Its ideology, methodology, and sociology. Knowledge-Creation Diffusion Utilization, 4(2), 173-198.

 

Hjørland, B. (2000). Documents, Memory Institutions, and Information Science. Journal of Documentation, vol. 56(1), s. 27-41.

 

Kline, R. R. (2006), Cybernetics, management science, and technology policy: The emergence of "information technology" as a keyword, 1948-1985. Technology and Culture, 47(3), 513-535. 

 

Lunt, B; Reichgelt, H.; Ashford, T.;  Phelps, A.; Slazinsk, E & Willis, C. (2003).What is the new discipline of information technology? Where does it fit? CIEC Conference January 28 thru 31, 2003, Tucson, Arizona. Session ETD 343.  http://fie.engrng.pitt.edu/ciec2003/papers/9066.pdf  (Visited 18 April 2004).

 

Hoffmeyer, J. (1985). Samfundets naturhistorie. 2. udgave. Charlottenlund: Rosinante. (1. udg. 1982).
 

Olsson, L. (1992). I&D och profession - en fråga om teknik? Bidrag til 8:de Nordiska IoD, Helsingborg 19-21 maj, 1992. 10 sider. (I proceedings kun resumé på 1 side - manuskript udleveret på konferencen)

 

Orlikowski, W. J. & Iacono, C. S. (2001). Research commentary: Desperately seeking the "IT" in IT research - A call to theorizing the IT artifact. Information Systems Research, 12(2), 121-134.
 

Saracevic, T. (1992). Information science: origin, evolution and relations. IN: Conceptions of Library and Information Science. Historical, empirical and theoretical perspectives. Ed. by Pertti Vakkari & Blaise Cronin. London: Taylor Graham. (Pp. 5-27).

 

Saracevic, T. and Dalbello, M. (2003). Digital library research and digital library practice: How do they inform each other? An unpublished study. http://www.scils.rutgers.edu/~tefko/Saracevic_Dalbello_DLib_02.doc

 

Warner, J. (2000). What should we understand by information technology (and some hints at other issues)? Aslib Proceedings, 52(9), 350-370.

 

Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.(2005). Information Technology. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_technology



Journal:

Journal of Information Technology. London: Chapman & Hall, vol. 1-, 1986-. (Journal of the Association for Information Technology). http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jit/



See also: Automation; Computer science, theoretical; Information Technology; Library technique

 

 

 

 

Birger Hjørland

Last edited: 21-11-2006

Home

 

 

 

 

 

to be edited:
I forhold til BDI-sektoren udgør edb især et medium for de dokumenter, der er BDI-områdets raison d'etre. Medie-aspektet udgør kun et blandt mange væsentlige aspekter ved dokumenterne. Af disse er medie-aspektet - i al fald indtil videre - det mest udvendige aspekt ved et dokument. Dette giver sig f.eks. udtryk i, at det samme dokument, f.eks. den samme avis, ofte er tilgængelige i mange medier: trykt udgave, mikrofilm, online og som cd-rom. Dokumentets faglige indhold er temmelig upåagtet af, hvad medium, det optræder i. Der er således ikke nogen nær eller direkte sammenhæng mellem den faglige udviklingslinie, der påvirker dokumenternes indhold og den teknologiske udviklingslinie, der påvirker dokumenternes medier: medieudviklingen foregår efter en teknologisk udviklingslinie, der hovedsageligt formes i de meget store teknologiske forskningslaboratorier, f.eks. Philips. Denne udvikling kan BDI-forskningen næppe gøre sig forhåbninger om at bidrage væsentligt til.

Der kan være tale om en forskning (lad os kalde det følgeforskning), der når den nye teknologi er introduceret undersøger dens anvendelse i BDI-sektoren. Der kan f.eks. være tale om pædagogiske, psykologiske, sociologiske, økonomiske og organisatori­ske analyser af informationsteknologens konsekvenser (se *informationsteknologi, konsekvensvurdering for BDI-sektoren), eller f.eks. udformning af hjælpesystemer, brugerundervisning o.lign. konstruktive bidrag. Alt i alt er denne "følgeforskning" dog temmelig passiv og uden større mulighed for konstruktive at præge BDI-sektorens egen fremtid.

En aktiv, indflydelsesrig forskningsindsats forudsætter et andet perspektiv. Den forudsætter, at man ikke tager udgangspunkt i informationsteknologien, men anvender denne som et middel til at løse de opgaver, der dybest set er BDI-sektorens, f.eks. informationssøgningens problematik.

Man kan således gå ned i dagens virkelighed, og se på hvordan forskere (eller andre brugere) søger information, hvor effektivt det foregår, og sætte sig som målsætning at bidrage til en effektivisering af denne informationssøgning (som f.eks. Hjørland, 1989). Man kan herpå identificere nogle problemer og prøve at anføre deres løsning, herunder måske opstille krav til information­s­teknologiske systemer. Sådanne forskningsproblemer er på mange måder meget krævende, men det er på dette plan de virkeligt relevante problemer for BDI-forskningen ligger.